|
Post by Musesboy on Jan 26, 2007 15:29:03 GMT -5
Pex suggested that Head Coaches could become part of our league scoring. This poll is designed to see what level of interest that would have.
There are a number of issues...
With 14 teams and 32 coaches, should we say that teams can have either one or two each? Or at least say that no team can have no more than two so that everyone will get one?
Should they be able to have contracts, or should we draft them for a single year and do that every year? If we do have contracts for them, should we increase our cap?
If we add them, how do we do it? We could make them part of the rookie draft. We could hold a separate draft just for coaches? If we choose the latter option, what should the draft order be? Current rookie draft order? Reverse rookie draft order? Randomly generated order?
If we add them, how many points should a win be worth?
How many points for a loss?
Should starting them be compulsory, or should owners have the option?
For instance, if we said 10 points for a win and -5 for a loss, it might be better for an owner just to sit their HC rather than risk a loss against a tough opponent. If we made it compulsory, we could just say 10 or 15 for a win and nothing for a loss (less work to maintain).
As you can see, this is a complicated issue.
I'll cast my vote now: I don't want Head Coaches added to our current scoring. But as always, I will go by the wishes of the majority.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Aub on Jan 26, 2007 15:38:11 GMT -5
I voted. (I think we should note if we've voted just in case a non-league member were to put his or her two cents in.)
|
|
|
Post by Musesboy on Jan 26, 2007 15:54:58 GMT -5
I voted. (I think we should note if we've voted just in case a non-league member were to put his or her two cents in.) I completely agree. It would be good if everyone posted something to say they have voted. Some may want to clarify their reasons or suggest a further alternative.
|
|
|
Post by tazinib1 on Jan 26, 2007 16:40:36 GMT -5
I voted. No to adding the HC to this league. The new league would be a different story however.
|
|
|
Post by BandwagonMark on Jan 26, 2007 19:38:18 GMT -5
voted on both.
|
|
|
Post by boehlerking01 on Jan 26, 2007 23:02:46 GMT -5
I would have to agree with Taz here...If the new leagues are going to have the HC option then I dont think we should change this.....But if they are not going to be in the new leagues I think I might change my mind.
I voted!
|
|
|
Post by chisoxrmh on Jan 27, 2007 13:55:51 GMT -5
I voted NO.
My reasoning is because I don't quite understand how it would be implimented into our scoring. If I knew just a little of how it would work, I might have to re-vote.
I look at this league as being unique.........but we shouldn't overcomplicate things if it's not necessary. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by kchihuahua on Jan 27, 2007 15:07:03 GMT -5
I voted NO for head coaches in this league. Although I do like the head coaches idea, I just don't want it in this league., because this league is already so detailed and complicated already. I don't want to have to deal with head coaches too. I like the idea, just not for this league.
|
|
|
Post by rellik on Jan 29, 2007 0:40:25 GMT -5
Looks like that takes care of that one
|
|
|
Post by PEX on Jan 30, 2007 13:59:19 GMT -5
I also vote NO ... I'd like to see it in a new league but for this league I'd rather have it stay as is.
|
|
|
Post by Musesboy on Feb 2, 2007 13:26:11 GMT -5
Ok, no head coaches for the BDFL.
I will probably add it into the rules for the new leagues we are setting up.
|
|